Similar Posts

10 Comments

  1. This is one I thought this year’s Giller jury might have highlighted, but I wasn’t surprised to see it on the Atwood-Gibson Prize. It’s definitely on my TBR (but I did not receive an ARC-lucky you!) and I think it’s important to see some consideration of the complex nature of enslavement, how it was wielded by the powerful in so many different ways, rather than that there are always two groups, one predatory and one victimized, because it’s not always that simple.

    1. So true! I was surprised when I first read about the Indigenous enslaving escaped black people, but it (sadly) ‘makes sense’ in a way, when people are struggling for power, this a natural result

  2. Interesting – I certainly don’t know enough about the Underground Railroad and have never considered the interactions between the two oppressed groups. I can see why it would be in the running for awards.

    1. I’m also reading a novel with a journalist trying to get a woman’s story before she’s tried for murder. I love those kinds of narratives. I’m unsurprised that indigenous people had black slaves as different vulnerable groups will see each other as less. For instance, Gandhi fought for Indian independence, but he also thought that Africans were savages.

    1. I think 14 years old and up would be appropriate to read this, although this can be a very personal question that’s dependent on the child. A teenager who reads widely would have no problems with this one.

Comments are closed.