Similar Posts

27 Comments

  1. I am like you I’m revisiting my own Nancy drew books I received as a 8 to 11year old at that time I didn’t fully appreciate them now I’m enjoying them I’ve even complete my collection of the books that were released in Britain

  2. I loved the Nancy Drew books as a child and saved my hardcovers. Some books hold up better than others, obviously. I recommend “The Crooked Bannister” and “Password to Larkspur Lane” as two standouts. The latter has a part where Nancy is in trouble, trapped, alone, and begins to doubt herself and despair. The way she overcomes her fear and demonstrates resourcefulness is excellent.

  3. I have always loved ND,in fact I rereread(😍) several series such as the Dana Girls, Kay Tracey, Penny Parker, etc. all written by Mildred Wirt. The foremost reason for reading, especially ND, is the positive representation of the characters, something very much NOT in abundance back in the 1930’s.

  4. Good article but your criticism over Bess being described as slightly overweight is slightly vexing. Vexing enough that I felt the need to comment. Just because a character is described as being overweight doesn’t mean the book is sexist. Writers try to describe people in such a way that you can picture them clearly in your mind, surely the writer was attempting to do this and was not trying to be offensive. Its also worth mentioning that in the Hardy Boys mystery series which was published at the same time by the same publisher and are quite similar, the brothers, Frank and Joe’s best friend Chet, is described as being overweight and loving to eat. Does this mean the book is prejudiced against men? No! That’s utter nonsense!
    In this day and age people get offended over nothing.
    I enjoyed reading your article but I just wish people wouldn’t get offended over trivial things.
    Thanks for the read.

    1. That’s a fair point about Chet’s description, but on the whole there is much more focus on Nancy and her friends appearances than any other men in the books , which is very common for work written back then. Even today, women’s appearances, their body types specifically, are constantly being criticized. As a woman, I can say this with certainty. The overwhelming number of people with eating disorders is hardly a ‘trivial’ matter, so I believe it’s important to point out how pointless and harmful these descriptors can be. It didn’t take away from my enjoyment of the books, but as a book reviewer, the whole point of this blog is to offer my reactions to what I read.

    2. Sorry for the late reply.
      Yes it’s true, eating disorders are no laughing matter, and people that have them should seek help. Note, that I never said that someone suffering from an eating disorder was a trivial matter. I stated that a books description of someone being slightly overweight was trivial. I doubt that just because a book describes someone as being slightly overweight and loving to eat that would make someone have an eating disorder. More likely it would stem from as you said, people criticizing their body types or being made fun of.

      Still, I understand where you are coming from, both women and men alike face different challenges with what is sometimes expected of them. For example, men who are small and skinny with little muscle tend to be picked on or thought little of as well as overweight men.

      Anyhow, this time I plan to press the “email me new posts” so i can see a reply before it takes me a month to respond. Haha.
      If you ever review any Hardy Boys books, I’d love to see them!

    3. I had never thought of reading some Hardy Boys, but it’s a good idea!!! I bet they’d be fun to revisit

Comments are closed.