Similar Posts

13 Comments

  1. Although your review is lovely, it honestly made me want to go back and pick up The Shining by Stephen King, also about a writer locked away and having some wild issues with seeing things!

  2. It sounds as if she’s had fun with the idea of the possibly mad writer! Shock endings can be hit or miss for me – the idea of “I didn’t see that coming” always leaves me feeling a bit like, well, actually if a plot is believable, then you should feel you could see the end coming, if you see what I mean. Or at the very least, once the ending does come, it should seem to be a logical outcome…

    1. Yes I know what you mean. I like being surprised, but on the other hand, is that just too unbelievable…

  3. This sounds like she uses the idea of the unreliable narrator in some new ways. I kind of like it when authors create a fictional version of themselves that’s very subversive. I read a mystery from a New Zealand author a couple of years back where the main character was a successful author and potentially a murderer.

    1. Ohh yes I love that! It shows they don’t take themselves too seriously which I always appreciate

  4. I was hoping that others would have read this too so I could see what opinions you were hoping to unearth about what one should expect from a thriller and whether an ending is credible. And I’ve not read it, so all I can say, is that I love to be surprised but I do not love being manipulated. If an ending shocks me, I want to sit in that shockedness for a moment before I recognize that all the credible evidence was there and I overlooked it, that that was the right ending after all.

    1. Well….the credible evidence here would be hard to find, it really does come out of nowhere. But I’m finding more and more when it comes to thrillers, if I don’t think too hard about them, I enjoy them more haha

    2. Haha. Well, thank you for clarifying, so that I can guess I’d probably find this very frustrating.

Comments are closed.