Similar Posts

7 Comments

  1. I recently finished reading a nonfiction book about a serial killer set in the 1960s. Something interesting I learned: in the 1960s so many young people up and disappeared because they were hippies. Teen boys and young men often reappeared later after their adventure was over. Teen girls and young women did not. When parents tried to work with local police to find their missing children, police often ignored their pleas, saying kids run away all the time because they’re hippies. Can you imagine how many girls and women in the 1960s were likely murdered and society just never bothered to look??

    That’s part of why I’m pleased there are so many books now dedicated to demonstrating the value of women and girls and finding them or their killers.

    1. Ugh that’s so sad, but not surprising. I’ve got a few true crime books on my shelf that deal with that very thing. Right now I’m reading a book about the cult by Keith Raniere! Review to come soon…

  2. I’m afraid when authors hold things back it has the same effect on me as you – it irritates me to the point of switching off rather than making me want to read on to find out what I’m not being told. And damaged detectives – is there really any room left for more of them? Think I’ll pass on this one…

    Haha, sorry, just read that over, and I sound even grumpier than usual! :D

  3. Hahaha, I know exactly what you mean about not having taken the intended “cue” from a book’s title. I read a collection of stories last year which gave away the theme in the title and I completely missed it! It’s like when someone points out a detail in a cover illustration and I’ve completely overlooked that part of the picture…like a razor blade instead of a petal in a bouquet. Oops.

    I’ve never felt drawn to McLain’s novels but I’ve found it interesting to read the different responses to a different kind of story from her pen.

Comments are closed.