Similar Posts

12 Comments

  1. So, the #1 reason I haven’t been interested in reading this book is because I’m not a big fan of Bridget Jones. Her behavior and personality is mega annoying to me, nor do I see her as the feminist icon she was supposed to be when the novel was first published. In fact, her obsession with losing weight, having the right job, and squishing herself into shaper wear is all in an effort to get a man to want to have sex with her. UGH. Your review of Queenie makes the main character sound completely different from Bridget, so thank you for highlighting that!

    1. Oh yes, I can’t stress that enough. I have no idea why Bridget Jones was used as a comparison, this is literally the opposite!

  2. I loved Bridget Jones, so I’d probably be annoyed by the comparison too even if for different reasons. This sounds much more serious even if the tone is humorous in places.

  3. My thinking is that the comparison was made more about the novel by Helen Fielding rather than the film that you’ve so handily GIFed up above.

    In my opinion, the two are quite different. Although, once you’ve seen the film, it’s hard to un-see it and read the Diary as an independent story?

    The novel, to me, is dark and sad – and yes, sometimes Bridge does/says something funny – but there’s a whole current under there which questions what/how/why women chase the things (people/goals/weights) they chase.

    That’s the part that, to me, seems to fit with what I’ve read about Queenie. But I’ve yet to actually READ Queenie. :) It’s coming in paperback soon, IIRC?

    1. What does IIRC mean? And I like your comparison about Bridget Jones, it makes total sense. Although when publicists flippantly write these things it irritates me so I always feel the need to complain about it hahaa

Comments are closed.